Thursday, 3 October 2019

Goodreads feminist reviews - El mundo de los druidas (featuring druidesses in Celtic culture)

Book: Exploring the World of the Druids (Spanish translation - El mundo de los druidas), by Miranda J. Green
5/5 Goodreads review also here. Instagram stories with quotes and comments will also feature in this review (as usual, click on all pics or open in new tab for larger size)

As I read the Spanish translation of this book, the quotes and some of the commentary will be in Spanish in the case of this post.
I found this book to be a well-researched, well-structured and engaging work about the world of the druids. The book starts with a series of chapters delving into what we know about the druidism of Ancient Celtic societies, from Classic author commentaries to archaeological findings, then discusses the Celtic revival and rekindled interest about the ancient druids in the 18th-19th Century (complete with all the misconceptions from the times linking druids to megalithic monuments xD), and finishes with a couple of chapters about modern neopaganism and neodruidism.

 
                                              My sketches of druidesses (Source 1 and 2)

+1 The book also includes a whole chapter discussing the role of women in ancient druidry, focusing on Classic references, mythological mentions and archaeological depictions of druidesses and priestesses.  
After the review I'll also post a series of IG stories with some excerpts from this chapter. 


 +1 I also liked the objective, non-binary, 'grey-morality-mindset' approach to discussing a series of subjects. Instead of taking a side as some authors sometimes do in this cases, for example, the author objectively points out issues such as the fact that, when writing about the druids and their religion, Roman authors (and also 18th-19th authors during the revival) tended to both demonize them (thanks to xenophobic colonialism and double standards) *and* also often offered an overly idealized view of them (ignoring dodgy religious traditions such as (human) sacrifice, for example) - While pointing out that neither approach was that accurate or complete.

I liked that neutral, scientific approach of discussing all approaches without contributing to either promoting a problematic 'uncivilized people' mindset, or erasing objectionable aspects of a culture (as it's still done today when discussing 'exotic' far away subjects such as Celtic culture, a topic so influenced by the idealized lens of the myths and the modern Revival).

+1 When talking about the modern druid orders from the 18th-19th Century to the present, I also liked that the author pointed out the fact that many of these groups had patriarchal foundations with only male members, and that only relatively recently has neodruidism (especially in groups such as OBOD, the Order of Bards, Ovates and Druids) come to consider gender equality more seriously when it comes to their members. I also liked the references to modern witchcraft and neopaganism being strongly linked with the feminist movement, especially in the USA.
  -1 One thing I did found a bit confusing, especially considering the level of research of this book: A couple of (potentially ambiguous) references comparing Christianity with ancient pagan religions (such as druidism or Roman polytheism) seemed to imply that one difference between the mindset of Christian religion and pagan ones is that pagan religions were more interested and more strongly linked with material aspects such as power (be it political or financial), while Christian priests had 'moral' issues of dealing with 'achieving the salvation of the people' as their main aim. She even states that it is 'surprising' to see druidry (or Roman religion) so linked with political power.

If this is what the author meant, then it is technically incorrect on all levels, and it baffles me, considering the objectivity and level of research of the rest of the book. Christianity, as all organized religions, was strongly linked with political and financial power as well, *incredibly* so, and still is today :S And *all* religions - albeit some more than others, and the Abrahamic ones might certainly take the cake :S xD - always have to do with supposedly 'moral' issues, dealing with societal behaviour to a greater or lesser degree (druidism very much included - For example, the druids taught the belief of reincarnation, which meant warriors were more fearless and thus better in battle, which always suits political issues. Their main aim certainly wasn't giving altruistic hope). This 'moral content' generally acts as a very effective brainwashing tool in all cases, which is obviously linked with power as well. And, contrary to the author's wordings, I do not consider the modus operandi of Christian priests or any religious participant to deal with 'ethical' issues in the slightest - Ethics does not mean control and ruling through fear and superstition, which is what religious teachings normally intend to do.
  • Excerpts about Celtic women and druidesses
Featuring quotes from the chapter of the book about Celtic women and mentions of druidesses and priestesses, in archaeological finds, Classical author commentaries, and myth).

 These are stories from my personal (non-cosplay) Instagram, @martaluthien. You can also find the stories in my 'Feminist reviews  2-3' and 'Celtic world 1' highlights.

-Women in Ancient Celtic Society

 
                                 
-Druidesses and priestesses - Classical mentions and archaeological finds
   


-Druidesses, priestesses and magical women in Irish myth, featuring Fedelm and Scáthach:




 
Fedelm, the armed poetess with foresight and druidic attributes from the Táin
Fedelm and Queen Medb, by Ayrtha on DeviantArt

My painting of warrior Scáthach, who also had druidic prophetic attributes
  • More about druidesses:


Source of the article: Ancient Celtic women by Metal Gaia 
          


 
 

French painter Virginie Demont-Breton (1859-1935). She had quite a successful painting career, served as the president of the Union of Women Painters and Sculptors, and managed to open, alongside feminist and sculptor  Hélène Bertaux , an art school exclusively for female students (as women were not admitted to the École des Beaux-Arts, thanks, Patriarchy). Van Gogh painted a version of one of her works, but of course I always knew about him and didn't know about this cool female artist until recently :S
I love all these 19th Century depictions of druidesses I've been showing here (and yay for late 19th Century female artist Virginie Demont-Breton :D), but there's also a double standard that I also think is worthy of mention - The fact that, while male druids are generally depicted in the stereotypical image of the wise and venerable bearded man, female druids are here pretty much always depicted as young and societally attractive. We of course also have the mostly negative stereotpypical image of the witch as an old (ugly) woman, a blatant double standard compared to the positive figure of the old and wise wizard. Like, male gaze and sexist stereotypes don't show anywhere, oh no :S

And finally, to xit with some more feminist commentary xD, all this  reminded me of a pretty jarring moment in the deplorable sexist-fest that is the comic of Astérix and the Secret Weapon (La Rose et le Glaive).
 

Since childhood I've hated the way the authors take the issues of feminism and female empowerment and play them for cheap laughs, with a good share of the most basic sexist stereotypes in Patriarchy's repertoire you could imagine :S :/ 

This scene specifically, coming from someone who loves the characters of Astérix and druid Panorámix (Getafix), is especially cringy and frustrating - A conversation between two of the characters most described as wise, intelligent, sensible and logical that starts as what looks like actual feminist ally content, but ends with cheap sexism for laughs :S Panorámix/Getafix seemingly starts talking about women's rights and how times are changing, and then instantly snorts at the mere idea of women being able to be druidesses (so frustrating not only because of the sexism but also because of the historical inaccuracy of that fact :S). And yeah, when you're a little girl and the Astérix comics become pretty much your first actual fandom that you're incredibly hyped about, and you want to be a warrior woman and a druidess thanks to the role models of Astérix and Panorámix - Seeing your role models basically laugh at the extravagant idea of women being able to be things and do things is pretty upsetting :S Which is why representation and allies matter so much.

2 comments:

  1. Estupenda información, interpretación y comentarios, como siempre. Soy fan.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Lo acabo de releer y me encanta :)

    ReplyDelete