Showing posts with label Doctor Who women. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Doctor Who women. Show all posts

Wednesday, 22 February 2023

Goodreads reviews - Doctor Who audiodramas: First Doctor era Short Trips


I've still got a handful of Goodreads reviews I haven't posted on here, so here's another post of that! A Whovian one, with several Big Finish short trips featuring the First Doctor and most of his companions (Barbara, Ian, Susan, Vicki, Steven, Polly and Ben). I have listened to all First Doctor short trips to date, but I haven't reviewed all of them except for the star ratings, so here below I'll be listing both the audios I'll be discussing here, and those I have also listened to, but haven't reviewed yet, in case I end up expanding this post in the future!

The audios I will be discussing: 


  •  Etheria (2015, short trip #5.09, featuring One, Vicki and Steven).
  • Falling (2017, short trip #7.05, featuring One, Polly and Ben).
  • O Tannenbaum (2017, short trip #7.12, featuring One and Steven).
  • A Small Semblance of Home (2018, short trip #8.09, featuring One, Barbara, Ian and Susan).
     

The audios I haven't written a review for, as yet: 


So let's go with those first four audios! Spoilers for the plots!

1. Audio: Etheria (2015, short trip #5.09, featuring One, Vicki and Steven). Written by Nick Wallace and performed by Peter Purves (who plays Steven Taylor in Doctor Who).

3/5. Goodreads review also here

+1 Engaging narration style by Peter Purves, who played Steven Taylor in the series. For short trips he also always does the voices of the First Doctor and, in this case, also for Vicki.

Note: I recently found out via several sources about Purves' numerous infidelities during his first marriage with several female coworkers from Doctor Who and Blue Peter, and, while I quite like the character of Steven Taylor, I was also pretty disappointed by the actor's behaviour and nonchalantly phrased views on this matter :S. Similarly, yeah, we can note that William Hartnell was noticeably old-fashioned in his views (as Anneke Wills and Michael Craze commented on, for example), and his mindset included conservative sexist and racist notions. But in this particular case, seeing as Peter Purves features pretty heavily in these First Doctor audiodramas, I'm dropping a comment on Purves specifically because, apart from the character vs actor/writer exercise we're often forced to make when we enjoy fandoms, we should also hold the cast of our fave fandoms accountable for their problematic aspects, or at least not let those aspects be hidden under the rug  as they often are 😬.

+1 This story features mainly Vicki, and I really like Steven as well, but Vicki instantly makes anything 100% better in my personal experience 😃 xD

+-1 I enjoyed the idea of the plot, involving the TARDIS team being held captive by Space Pirates and exposed to an oniric substance that makes the Doctor and Vicki believe they're on a supernatural-behaving planet on a quest to find the TARDIS, as well as rescue captive Steven. However, the plot also dragged at times for me, and I didn't find it as engaging as other Big Finish stories.

-1 Casual sexism, patriarchal 'chivalry' edition: At the end, there's a moment when the Doctor asks Steven to 'escort' Vicki to the TARDIS while he deals with the antagonists. Couldn't he have said something along the lines of 'Vicki, Steven, wait for me in the TARDIS'?? Additionally grating seeing as rescuing Steven was what the story was all about, and Vicki was the most proactive of the two companions throughout it.

Vicki can definitely handle herself, thank you xD

 -1 Vicki is the only female character in the tale. 

                             

2. Audio: Falling (2017, short trip #7.05, featuring One, Polly and Ben). Written by Jonathan Barnes and performed by Anneke Wills (who plays Polly Wright in Doctor Who). 


3/5. Goodreads review also here

+1 Engaging narration style by Anneke Wills, who plays Polly in Doctor Who, and here she also does the voices of Ben and the First Doctor.

+1 Interesting structure with flashbacks and flashforwards - Polly, years after stopping her travels with the Doctor, now married to Ben and on the verge of moving houses, finds a memento which makes her recall a former adventure with the Doctor.

Maybe they'll go to India next, like the canonical reference in Sarah-Jane Adventures?

 +1 Continuity and parallels: There's some foreshadowing about the First Doctor's regeneration, encountering in a rather dreamlike adventure an alien angel-like creature with emerald-feathered wings who, similarly to the Ood with Ten, reminds the Doctor that his present incarnation is close to its end (this adventure supposedly happens exactly before 'The Tenth Planet'). The angel also mentions that he is the last of his species, another foreshadowing for the New!Who post Time-War Doctor

First an alien angel, then the future Twelfth Doctor...One is probably pretty fed up with everyone trying to convince him into accepting to go through his first regeneration 😅 xD

+-1 Companion Ben Jackson is in my opinion a bit too idealized in this story, with Polly's narration emphasizing more than once how reliable, kind, brave and loyal he is. Ben does show all of these traits in the series, and Polly most definitely also holds her own in the series regarding agency and intelligence, but Ben also pretty patronizing towards Polly more often than I'd prefer, exhibiting casual sexism and male entitlement (the infamous "this is no job for a bird" line comes to mind, not to mention his 'you want to be careful who you encourage' stellar introduction 🙃), and, apart from some negative reactions from Polly, the series usually frames this as romantic chemistry, pretty much 😬. In view of this, I feel like some of these Short Trips I have listened to forget or want to ignore those more problematic traits in favour of portraying him as the ideal boyfriend/husband/man Polly can always rely on :S 

And Ben's attitude in that respect is a pity, because if it weren't for that I guess they would make a cute couple. But Ben tends to make it more difficult by being unnecessarily chauvinistic and patronizing from time to time, when Polly clearly also holds her own perfectly, and Ben also gets scared sometimes, as humans do. Sigh.

In this story especially, seeing as Polly and Ben are married in 'present time' and the flashbacks also tend to focus on their budding relationship. The relationship portrayed - albeit maybe idealized in this way - is not particularly problematic, though, with Polly seemingly retaining agency and an active life. Polly Wright has lost her surname and become Polly Jackson, however 😕, as usual in English-speaking countries (a custom which, yep, is inherently patriarchal). 

 

3. Audio: O Tannenbaum (2017, short trip #7.12, featuring One and Steven). Written by Anthony Keetch and performed by Peter Purves


2.5/5. Goodreads review also here.

Christmas-themed stories are generally not my cup of tea, and, apart from that, I found a couple of problematic issues in this particular one. But I also found Peter Purves' narration to be engaging, and I quite enjoyed Steven's pov in this story.

+1 Great narration and acting by Peter Purves aka Steven Taylor. His First Doctor impression has really grown on me, and I personally think he gets Hartnell's vocal mannerisms quite well. I enjoyed Steven's point of view and the fact that we learned a bit more about his backstory

+1 Enjoyed the dynamic between the Doctor and Steven in general. There's a moment when Steven thinks about getting into a snowball fight with the Doctor but thinks better of it because he doesn't want to get him grumpier 🤣 Meanwhile, Steven is also cold and just wants to go to the beach xD

Get Steven to the beach already, Doctor xD!

+1 We get some cute caring!Doctor moments when interacting with a little girl ("I returned downstairs to find that the Doctor, a man who could terrify Daleks and bring down Galactic empires, was captivating a little girl with a rabbit made from his handkerchief"). Being Christmas, the little girl - Gretta - also wonders whether the Doctor is Father Christmas xD

+1 The Doctor mentions the pagan origins of the Yule tree. Fed up as I am to see narrow-minded Christian people getting affronted every single year when anyone dares to comment on the pre-Christian origins of 'their' Winter holiday, I appreciated that moment very much xD 

One is offending the narrow-minded religious folks and being happy about it xD

+1 There's some typically Whovian subversion of the good/evil binarism in the plot, as well as some environment-related social criticism (but not as much as I would have liked, as I'll discuss below): The antagonists are alien trees who attack people back when being felled (Whovian Ents, kinda!), and rather than being 2D 'baddies', they have motivations and a backstory behind their violence. And the Doctor speaks Tree - of course he does 😂

Treebeard approves

+-1 This is more of an exploration of the more problematic aspects of the dynamic between the Doctor and Steven more than an actual fault of the audio -  When describing the dynamic from Steven's pov, we see how it is sometimes not as equal or healthy as he (and I) would like - More than once Steven feels like he has to tread carefully in order not to make the Doctor grumpy, and when the danger is over, the Doctor decides when they're going back to the TARDIS, with Steven reluctantly following because if not he would have to put up with a 'barrage of petulance for being late', while thinking about how he would like to 'hang out with more people doing non-threatening things' for a while longer 😕. The series also explored the more fraught aspects of this dynamic at the end of 'The Massacre (of Saint Bartholomew's Eve)', with Steven being fed up at the Doctor's attitude after experimenting several rather traumatic adventures one after the other.

The First Doctor (alongside other incarnations) be often like that, sigh.

And now for the things I didn't like as much from the story 😅:

-1 There's only one female character in the story, the young girl, and she doesn't do much more than be frightened of the whole situation in general :S

+-1 Like I said, Christmas-themed stories are not really my fave genre, as they're often full of highly idealized and normartive issues regarding established societal holidays+the family system. It's nothing particularly overboard in this case, and I actually enjoyed some of the Christmass-y moments (such as the little girl mistaking One for Father Christmas or Steven saying the famous ending line from 'The Feast of Steven' in 'The Daleks' Master Plan' serial - "Merry Christmas to all of you at home" - as a way to finish this story). But yeah 😅

-1 The aspect I found the cringiest in this tale is that the Doctor solves the violent situation between the humans and the trees by invoking these holiday values in a way that I found pretty problematic - The trees got initially violent because the little girl's father had felled one to be the Christmas tree for their cottage, and the Doctor claims...that the trees should not be feeling attacked basically because humans have always thought of Yule/Christmas trees in terms of light, love and hospitality 🙃🤷‍♀️. But that doesn't take away the fact that a sentient tree was killed all the same (and personally, for a reason that's way more unnecessary and problematic than needing timber or fire wood, just saying), and as such, the trees had a pretty valid reason to feel attacked.

That's a bit like telling Treebeard and Co that in Maiar culture Saruman's destruction of trees comes from a place of love and hospitality, so they shouldn't be bothered 😅

I approved of the Doctor's typically epic pacifist speech about how it's not always right to answer violence with violence and how communication is key in order to understand each other, and so on, but in the context of this plot, it rang in a rather oddly fashion in the context of the final lesson of the story - which is that the trees basically end up being all friendly because the Doctor convinces them that sporadically killing them for decoration/superstition/tradition reasons is done in a way that has 'nothing to do with malice, cruelty or wanton destruction', so it's OK! Cringy af. I also personally beg to differ in our real life context about this topic, because, even when they're not sentient, what is felling trees in order to decorate your house for a month, tops, if not falling under the category of wanton destruction, a little bit 😅?  

And the fact that the trees are freaking sentient in this story complicates things even more. I mean, that's a bit like the Doctor concluding that if a person happened to be killed as part of a holiday which was theoretically about "love and light" and all-round "positive values", that would make it all good and no one should feel attacked - which sounds pretty absurd and very un-Doctorly indeed, right? (only, human sacrifices at festivities that are theoretically about light and prosperity have happened historically more than we'd like to think, in too many places 😬).

I would have preferred that the end result would have been that both parties would have simply  apologized for their respective misunderstadings and errors, come to terms with their respective violence, and reached an actual truce where trees are also not happy to provide some of their own for the humans' festivities, because the humans would have understood that..murdering sentient trees because of Christmas is unnecessary and a little bit wrong 🙃. They did reach a truce in this case, but I'm not that much of a fan of a solution along the lines of 'because this religion/holiday actually means well, you shouldn't feel attacked for their actual violence' :S Christmas comes before anything else! Lol nope. 

-1 And finally, the Doctor includes the infamous 'smacked bottom' line in his scolding speech against the trees' violence, and I really hate that (sexist) Hartnell line, so I'm definitely not a fan of that addition, and I don't like the idea that One would say that line often 😑 (ew).


4. A Small Semblance of Home (2018, short trip #8.09, featuring One, Barbara, Ian and Susan). Written by Paul Phipps and performed by Carole Ann Ford (who plays Susan Foreman in Doctor Who). 

3/5. Goodreads review also here.

+1 Engaging and enjoyable narration style by Carole Ann Ford, who played Susan Foreman, the Doctor's granddaughter from Gallifrey, in the series. In this audio she also voices the First Doctor, Barbara and Ian.

The first TARDIS Team!

+1 In this story, the First Doctor searches for tea leaves, planning to include tea in the TARDIS food machine (apparently they didn't have it before! 🤣), in order to make Barbara (and Ian) feel more at home, and it's such a British trope thing to do xDD 

“I know things haven’t been easy, my dear, and that’s why I’ve been looking for this plant, these tea leaves, because I knew it was the one thing I could do to make this silly old ship a little more comforting for you.” (I think that Barbara and Ian would also appreciate it if you knew how to drive the TARDIS and didn't put them in danger every single time, though 😅).

+1 It's also a story that mainly revolves around Barbara and her inner thoughts and feelings about her adventures with the Doctor. And it's always refreshing to encounter a story that focuses on how the female characters feel and think, so yay. 

Yay for Barbara!
In this tale, Barbara expresses her sense of wonder about her adventures, but she also feels tired by the non-stop action and especially disorientated for the relative way in which she's experiencing time (she keeps a notebook in which she tries to keep track of time). She also talks about being pretty tired (as is Ian) of the Doctor's bouts of self-centered 'scientific projects' which have them dragged off from planet to planet non-stop. I feel like it's very interesting and necessary to not only portray and focus on the good, exciting things about time-travelling in the TARDIS, but also show the realism of the companions feeling exhausted by the continuous adrenaline or fed up with some of the Doctor's more inconsiderate traits.

+1 Female bonding, with Susan and Barbara talking about their feelings and experiences in several scenes. This story also includes some backstory of Barbara's life, especially the positive dynamic with her mother (mother-daughter female bonding ftw!), with whom she used to have lunch on Sundays and talk about her week:

“One day, one day I’ll tell you all about my travels, all my adventures through time and space. One day I’ll make you tea and share all of the stories your daughter can tell.”

+-1 While the fact that the Doctor plans to get tea for Barbara and Ian is cute, he also behaves in a problematic fashion in this story, following a trend that he can also see repeated in several of his TV serials, such as 'The Daleks'. In this case, he may have the ultimate intention of making Barbara and Ian feel more comfortable around the TARDIS and less homesick, but the way he accomplishes this is not any different from the way he drags his companions off at any moment's notice to fulfil the rest of his personal scientific projects, without taking into account what their companions might feel like doing, or how tired they might be 😬.

Tell him, Barbara!

Ian and Barbara actually spend quite a section of this story complaining exactly about that issue and confront the Doctor about his more self-centered and inconsiderate attitude when it comes to his 'personal projects'. And there's the problematic fact that the Doctor seems to think that his companions will feel 100% happy and satisfied with the surprise that he plans for them (and especially for Barbara), without the need to change anything about the rest of the situation that bothers them 😬. What's more, Susan also ends up resorting to having to justify her grandfather's behaviour on his behalf, asking Ian and Barbara to basically put up with everything because 'he must have a good reason for it' 🙃. 

 “Doctor, wait! You’ve got to stop this! Barbara’s exhausted, and so am I! Everywhere we land, no matter how cold or how wet, you get us looking for this blasted plant! (…) You’re obsessed! It’s like Skaro all over again”
“I’ve apologized for that. You have no idea about the reasons behind my work. How dare you!”
This was a losing battle. It always was when the Doctor employed his ‘my ship, my rules’ argument.”

Here, I also can't but think of the analogy where this kind of strategy is favoured by many abusive men towards their (most often) female partners, resorting to the easy tactic of offering punctual gifts and surprises - which, being self-planned, can also be more ego power trips than actual consideration towards their partner - to compensate for a problematic behaviour they don't really plan on changing, or believe that they have to change :S. I'm obviously not saying that this is a perfect analogy with One because it isn't by any means - I wouldn't say the Doctor's abusive, but in both cases we can see similar traits based on (often male) entitlement, being inconsiderate and self-centered, and not wanting to be accountable for one's actions. 

Which can make for dysfunctional dynamics, and more than one companion has confronted him (her/them) about it when it gets too blatant or constant, starting with Barbara and Ian themselves (Steven also had several goes at it, as discussed above in 'O Tannenbaum'). Seeing as several (mostly male) incarnations of the Doctor do fall for this behaviour more often than we'd like, it's also nice to see Doctor Who content addressing the titular character's more problematic traits, so Barbara and Ian confronting the Doctor about it was a very good addition, even though the 'I got tea leaves for you' happy ending of this short story did take the very needed accountability off the Doctor's shoulders a little too fast for my liking.

And now have some caring Ian and Barbara as a palate cleanser after that discussion xD

 -1 The adventure portion of the tale features pretty traditional gender roles throughout 😬 The women scream (Susan does, as typically required for her character in the TV series in every single occasion 🙃), and the women get captured, while the men climb trees, defend themselves and try to rescue the women. The antagonists are a group of cavepeople (of caveMEN, because they all seem to be male) with apparently pretty regressive views on the matter as well (which I guess can be expected, but still, always grating). While the TV serials of 60s Who (and later) has depended on traditional gender roles more often than we'd like, undersusing more than one awesome female character as a result, we also know that in spite of those imposed gender roles and behaviour Barbara succeeds in being badass af in more than one occasion, so I found it more than a bit unnecessary to resort to a strictly traditional gender role viewpoint here, when the story is mainly focused on Barbara, too.

Barbara is badass, case in point

 +1 The Doctor starts by trying to have a peaceful conversation with the antagonists and then manages their escape with a non-violent ploy, which is a nice way of critisizing the more violent leanings of the human antagonists of this tale, as per the typical pacifist and anti-war stance in Doctor Who.

+1 Other fun tidbits: Apparently, the Doctor gets in the habit of choosing his companions' (Ian's, at least) clothes for them? xD Especially when it comes to compensating for clothes that got destroyed in alien planet shenanigans xDD 

“Ah, good morning, Chesterton! I see you’ve found the new cardigan I left for you. Very fetching! Very fetching indeed!”


Friday, 20 May 2022

Goodreads feminist reviews - Doctor Who audiodramas: The Blazing Hour

 Audio: The Blazing Hour, a Big Finish audiodrama from the 2021 Main Range series, featuring the Fifth Doctor and Turlough.

5/5. Goodreads review also here.  

 This story is a really good take on criticizing capitalism, colonialism and corrupt politicians. Peter Davison and Mark Strickson as Five and Turlough are on top form, with a great dynamic going on, and it's very refreshing that all the supporting cast are poc, with several female characters in varied roles as prime ministers, politicians, scientists and activists.

Representation matters 😃!

+1 In stark contrast to "Kerblam!" (welp), this story handles the criticism of a ruthless capitalist human colony system extremely well throughout. The story also includes a fleshed-out range of greymoral politician and corporate characters ranging from the overtly corrupt, to the incompetent and careless about life, to the more honourable. Unlike "Kerblam!", however, despite the existing 3D characterizations and greymorality amongst the cast, the story criticizes the more corrupt politician and corporate archetypes consistently when it's due, even though they may end up choosing a slightly less amoral and profit-exclusive action from time to time thanks to the influence of the Doctor and (mainly) their own self-survival selfish mindsets. 

For example, when an amoral and corrupt politician decides to sacrifice herself to help save the day, the Doctor, and especially Turlough, highlight the fact that her motivations where still mainly money and profit and her former problematic behaviour was not completely swept under the rug just for a 'redemption in death' trope, which was also refreshing. Meanwhile, anti-capitalist activists who also died in this story and showcased a much more moral and kind mindset throughout the plot's conflict were completely ignored by the final Prime Minister's official eulogy, as Turlough bitterly commented on. This kind of discourse was honestly sorely missed in "Kerblam!", which instead chose to coddle the capitalist higher-ups for making the slightest effort towards a potentially better (but for whom?) system.

I love Thirteen and the Fam, but Kerblam!'s way of tackling capitalism was not it

+1 The topic of profit over human (and alien native) life is repeteadly highlighted amid the social criticism themes of this story, and colonialism and classism are also strongly featured throughout. It's very refreshing that the most honourable politician characters happen to be members of the native species of the colonized planet, and activists against the capitalist system are also given positive characterizations.

+1 The story heavily tackles how a capitalist, colonialist and classist system can often put lives at risk by prioritizing profit, and the plot revolves around a catastrophic accident in an energy plant catalized by the corporate leaders in spite of the misgivings and warnings of the lead scientist of the project. While some have interpreted this plot as an anti-nuclear energy metaphor (the story uses "time energy" xD, but it's a valid comparison), Mark Strickson and the cast in general have spoken in the behind the scenes tracks about environmental factors and the need for green energy, speaking favourably about nuclear power as well. This story was indeed inspired by accidents such as Chernobyl, but, instead of being an anti-nuclear energy story, I personally interpret it as a criticism of how incompetent and amoral corporates in a capitalist society are quickly prone to putting lives in danger by throwing caution and safety to the wind and prioritizing profit, disregardless of the type of energy that the power plant may be using.

The Blazing Hour's excellent supporting cast. From top to bottom, left to right: Lynsey Murrell, Donna Berlin, Rakle Ayola, and Raj Ghatak.

+1 As mentioned above, the diversity representation among the cast is excellent, with a 100% poc supporting cast and women in many different roles, from the lead scientist to the president of the colony, several politicians and a member of the activist groups opposing the capitalist system. The fact that all the supporting cast are either of black or South Asian ethnicity, and that there are so many female characters in varied roles, puts a quick end to any possibility of negative stereotypes associated to either gender or race, in regards to the role, integrity values and personality of each character. As such, we have black actresses in positive roles of a competent and intelligent scientist or a brave activist (both roles very nicely played by Lynsey Murrell), not just as a moderately incompetent prime minister (Donna Berlin) or an amoral, self-serving politician (an excellent Rakle Ayola). Women also take a clear centre stage among the supporting cast, with only two distinct male characters, an incompetent corporate boss and a more principled native local leader, played by the same actor (Raj Ghatak). The voice work and variety of accents used by the supporting cast is so good you don't even realize many play at least two characters because all voices are so distinct.

 

+1 I also really liked the dynamic of Five and Turlough in this story. This is from the time at the end of Season 21 when they are having adventures alone, and in these audios with them you can clearly see that the bond between them has deepened, with Five being outright distraught and grieving for more than one episode when he is told that Turlough has allegedly died in the explosion caused by the accident, one of these scenes also acting as an additional stab in the feels with the reference to the companions he has formerly lost in this incarnation - most notably, Adric 😭 (a great characterization that is a refreshing change in contrast to the horrid treatment of Turlough's graphic torture and assault and the infuriating resulting emotional disconnect from the Doctor in books such as The King of Terror 😣 Although the Doctor isn't always the best when it comes to comforting and communicating with their companions when they are grieving, traumatized or struggling with mental health, truth be told :S - Tegan really needed that closure scene in Power of the Doctor 😭. So yeah, I really appreciated that Five was much more open emotionally in this respect throughout this audio).

Look at all the wholesome!

 +1 Turlough's dynamic with activist Fionn is also excellent, showing a partnership between a woman and a man that is refreshingly devoid of any sexism (or romance, for a change), and filled with mutual respect. It reminded me a bit of Turlough's dynamic with Norna on 'Frontios' quite a bit, although this one is more fleshed out.

+1 And as final related notes, I also liked the fact that when Turlough's legs get injured by the explosion and Fionn gets him a wheelchair to be able to get out of the building, she asks if he has a problem with it, and he remarks that not at all, as 'some of the best people use wheelchairs', and he's rather more worried about the fact that Fionn would have to wheel him around among the wreckage. 

 I also loved Turlough's characterization in this story, and you can really see his growth. Having evolved from his prior self-survival priorities (stemming greatly from his background and former trauma), he retains his sarcasm and more acerbic wit, but also showcases a greater willingness to make things right and take an active stand in trying to solve the situation, even though he still tends to berate himself for being a coward (which he honestly isn't, hot take. Like the Third Doctor said, bravery isn't about not being afraid, it's about being afraid and doing what you must in spite of it). Also, seeing as he originally comes from a high-class aristocratic family on his planet Trion, I also really liked to see how often and how intensely he criticized the self-serving attitude of the corrupt politician and corporate characters throughout the story, condemning that their one and only motivation seems to be only profit, money and power.

Friday, 4 June 2021

Feminist ramblings - Doctor Who and rape culture

Since May 2021, the Doctor Who community has been increasingly vocal about the issues of rape culture, harassment and sexism in the DW sets, the series, and the fandom community. This happened following the news that Noel Clarke, who played Mickey Smith on Doctor Who, abused and harassed multiple women (20 initially spoke out, and quite a few more followed) in various workplace settings, including the Doctor Who set back in 2005. The, I repeat, multiple testimonies of all these women show a wide range of sexist, abusive and predatory behaviour spanning years and including not only various workplaces, but also convention floors. Clarke has until now denied all allegations - As many men accused of harassment and abuse often do, shielded by systemic patriarchy and double standards.

Clarke's multiple cases of sexist workplace harassment were also the cause that allowed the DW community to discuss John Barrowman's (who played omnisexual Time Agent Jack Harkness in the series) own set of inappropiate workplace behaviour (which included continuous flashing on set). This has been know for years now, contrary to Clarke's harassment, but, at least to my knowledge, the fandom community had not really discussed the Barrowman issue till now to the extent I do believe it deserves to be talked about. Barrowman, however, also continues to justify and minimize his behaviour to this day, calling it 'harmless pranks' intended 'in good humour' (???), in spite of more than one set member claiming they felt uncomfortable about the whole situation, and the fact that it is literally completely unprofessional to behave in such a way in the workplace, period. Frankly, I don't care if he didn't intend to be super predatory about it, as it turns out that flashing your junk out and putting it on an actress' shoulder can very much qualify as sexual harassment, and is not just quirky jokester behaviour material.

This last month I've been on Instagram and Twitter (1 and 2) writing a couple of storytimes and threads on these topics, following not only the discussion on Clarke, Barrowman and other predatory DW cast, but also the discovery of several rapists and abusers within the Whovian cosplay community, such as @/redheadedchinny and @/timelordbrett.   I decided to post these threads on here as well, post-format, as rape culture and harassment are topics that have been very relevant to me for years, and many people can often disregard problematic issues when they're presented and normalized as part of their favourite fandoms. So here goes.

PART 1: Clarke, Barrowman and the problem of rape culture and workplace harassment

In this society full of rape culture and sexism, and particularly so in the film and TV industry where toxic workplaces aren't a thing of the past, unfortunately, it's not a rare occurrence to learn about yet another man accused of abuse, harassment and/or assault against women. By more than 20 women in the case of Noel Clarke, no less 😣. It might not take me by surprise, but it's still mentally taxing, especially as a woman, to see so many men abusing women and to see it so normalized it literally takes years and lots of bravery from the survivors to speak out.

And it's even more taxing when a part of the Doctor Who fandom is of course responding with the typical justifications of 'innocent until proven guilty', 'these women are lying' and 'all women definitely lied, but one (1) man saying it's all false is telling the truth, because rape culture rules'. Let's stop that shit already. This is Me Too all over again, and this trend will never stop unless abusers are made accountable for what they are often given free rein to do with no consequences. Fortunately, another part of the fandom was very critical of the behaviour of both Clarke and Barrowman, and they have also been made a bit more accountable by the BBC and other film industries (losing jobs, Bafta awards and/or their participation in ongoing projects).

It's also so important to speak up about this and normalize the fact that it is NOT OK to be sexist assholes to women. That it's not OK that workplaces are still sexist af and unsafe for women. That it's not OK to prioritize an abuser's feelings and 'what about his career' and 'that was in his past' vs what he actually did or is still doing to women. Because so many people, and especially the people in charge, keep accepting their excuses and their word over the testimony of multiple women, and don't demand the accountability they should. And if accountability and consequences and actual rules against sexism and harassment and abuse were more normalized, this would happen less. This also applies to the cosplayer abusers that have been unveiled lately in the DW community.

So even though it's been a rough time reading about multiple men in the DW cast and cosplay community being abusers and creeps and inappropriate and sexist, it's also positive that these issues are being talked about. And I applaud all the women who are speaking up about it most of all 👏👏👏👏 Women are so often silenced for fear of not being believed and being judged and attacked, which is a totally valid fear because it happens *a lot* :S, and I truly think you're all badasses.

Regarding the fact that these two actors have less than desirable behaviour in real life, personally I've never quite liked the character of Mickey (or Adam, or Captain Jack, to be honest). So fandom-wise it hasn't been as painful for me, as the work of separating character vs actor while consuming the fandoms we love can be difficult and hurtful. But still, it's horrible to see that the Doctor Who 2005 series set was full of so many creeps 😫. We can list Bruno Langley (Adam) and John Barrowman as well as Clarke, which makes me think if Billie Piper was OK and whether Christopher Eccleston was referring at least partly to that when he mentioned the toxic working environment which made him leave :S And if RTD and the rest of the team were aware of it all and let it slide :S

Toxic workplace environments are most certainly still not a thing of the past. Not enough has changed since Roddenberry et al abused their female cast on the set of Star Trek TOS in the 60s :/ Which is why we need to speak of this way more often, and stop it with the sexist double standards and the normalization of women being regularly harassed and abused in their workplaces. It happen too often, to too many.

I also have never liked Jack Harkness or John Barrowman very much, which was, at least to my perception, often an unpopular opinion in the DW fandom. And both Barrowman's behaviour on set and the way he often portrays Harkness is the main reason why :S Because Barrowman's portrayal of Captain Jack also seems to share traits with his workplace harassment in real life. The incessant unsolicited flirting, inappropriate comments and non-con kisses are not what being a queer character (or a queer celebrity) should be all about. It's just more harassment.

As an LGBT+ queer woman myself, I can appreciate the queer representation Jack brought to the show early on, but his portrayal also brought a problematic way of normalizing what is plain sexual harassment, as well as problematic queer stereotypes, to be honest :S For example, the idea that "bi/pan, gay and queer people in general are super horny and hypersexual all the time and will kiss you without asking while making inappropriate flirty remarks! Progressive! Representation!". Being flirty and/or queer is not the same as being creepy or inappropriate.

Nor does harassment and non-consensual behaviour, or sexism and misogyny, suddenly become cool and legit once the character or the real life person is queer, and I'm tired of seeing it all mixed up in more than one (usually male) queer character and celebrity in the media, tbh. Intersectionality matters. Well-off white gay men like Barrowman, for example, are obviously oppressed in the sexual orientation intersection, but can also be hella privileged when it comes to the gender, race and class intersections, and can most definitely be sexist, racist, classist and/or inappropiate.

I resented for years that Jack's behaviour was seen as cool and adorkable by (to my perception) quite a lot of people in the fandom. It seemed like I kept seeing fans hyped about Jack kissing Graham without consent or drawing fanart of him kissing Thirteen non-con in expectation of the special. The way the character was idolized for those traits as well, it seemed like not loving Jack was a super unpopular opinion hand in hand with not being able to openly criticize Barrowman to the extent that was needed (and this isn't news like it's more with Clarke :S). Like, I shouldn't be pleasantly *surprised* that he ended up, at freaking last, treating Thirteen and Yaz with respect at the special, and that he ditched the inappropriate innuendo for the most part. That is the bare minimum. I shouldn't give anyone a medal for that.
 
We deserve better queer rep than a non-con kiss between a queer man and a straight man, tbh :S   

We need better queer role models, characters and celebrities both, and we need to hold people accountable for their harassment no matter any other intersections. And we most definitely need to hold MEN accountable for their actions regarding rape culture and harassment.

And I'm not saying you have to hate the characters now! Maybe you still like Mickey Smith and/or Jack Harkness for the positive traits and representation that they also bring to the world of Doctor Who, and that's OK as well. I'm saying that we should also be critical of the questionable traits of both the actors and characters, and talk about how the actors' irl behaviour normalizes sexual harassment and rape culture, especially against women, and how they've been getting away with it for years.

Because they apparently think they still can get away with it, with Clarke denying all allegations (the nerve, ugh) and Barrowman quite literally thanking his fans in a recent video for defending him and supporting his inappropiate workplace behaviour (wtf) 😐.

 

PART 2: How New!Who also normalizes the problem of rape culture among the DW community

In this second part, I'm expanding a bit on the issue of the normalization of rape culture and harassment in the DW community, focusing on the way the series itself can actually promotes rape culture in its depiction of non-con scenes as either comedic, romantic, empowering, or queer representation.

General disclaimer that of course the DW community is also a wonderful place to be, that there are many wonderful DW cast and set members, and that the DW series and fandom is also full of amazing ethics and messages, and steadily more and more diversity and representation 😊✨🌈 But it's also important to be critical of the more problematic issues within the series and the community. And the issue of how rape culture is sometimes normalized in the series, and how a faction of the fandom reacts to this topic, is one of them. 
 
TW: Non-con kiss gifs and pics below

Why are some Whovians prone to excusing and justifying sexual harassment, and violence against women especifically? Maybe because the show itself - and Rassilon knows I adore Doctor Who - is also culpable of normalizing and legitimizing harassment and rape culture as legit more than once 😬

Apart from the inappropiate and creepy behaviour of some members of the cast in this case, I just wish that the series (and the media in general) would also stop the trend that a non-con kiss (I'm focusing mainly on kiss scenes here, seeing as DW is PG-13) is either funny, romantic, celebratory, or queer representation😐. It's none of these things! It's normalizing what is basically harassment and assault as completely fine. No matter who’s doing the kissing, we’ve got variety in New!Who, and it’s not just Jack Harkness. I’ve always been so frustrated at seeing these moments hyped by the fandom, to be honest, like I mentioned above as well 😬 .

The thing is, men kissing women non-con isn’t romantic, women kissing Tennant or any other incarnation non-con isn’t what agency and girl power should look like, and queer characters kissing others non-con as their MO is not good enough LGBT+ representation. It's just not.

And in the series, just the reaction of the characters to pretty much all instances of non-con kisses and sexual harassment as something used for either romance, female empowerment, comedic purposes, or queer rep helps a lot to normalize this behaviour just plain acceptable and normal. Some examples of this:

1) When Jack Harkness flirts at complete strangers as a hello, most of them are scripted as reacting favourably ("I don't mind!") or being so dumbfounded they don't say anything. He never gets admonished for his actions, the most he gets is the Doctor jokingly exclaiming 'Don't start!' - Which is more in the line of 'boys will be boys' than anything else. His penchant to sexualize anything that moves and make unsolicited advances is generally seen as a 'fun' and 'adorable' character trait, as well as the way legit queer representation works (not really tho). 
 

2) Scenes abound when the Doctor kisses or is kissed non-con, brushed as either romantic moments, grl power or comedy, with hardly any negative reactions going on either. Some examples:
 
Ten started his (shitty) dynamic with Martha by doing exactly this, and Martha reacts by having a crush on him for the entire series 3. She deserves so much better than this.
 
Rassilon also knows I adore the Eighth Doctor (go listen to Big Finish you fools xD) and actually rather like his dynamic with Grace Holloway, but a low of his TV tenure is having him kissing Grace as a celebratory thing, which also gets another favourable response instantly. I mean, it could be somewhat understandable, at least from a fanfic point of view, that you would be attracted to the concept of an attractive Time Lord in full Byronian aesthetic kissing you, albeit hopefully in a more consensual setting, but maybe let's not normalize the false idea that every woman is thrilled at the "romantic" prospect of being kissed out of the blue by what is technically a random stranger.

 
Plot armour also means that when Nine kisses Rose, she's in Bad Wolf mode and in no state to consent, and actually never even remembers the kiss. Not the best Doctor/Rosse setting for a romantic kiss. Whovians can like Doctor/Rose however much they like (I have dabbled in it myself), but this point still stands 😬

3) Violence against women is still the major societal problem, but it's also troubling how the media thinks it's subversive and empowering to have female characters with agency show that by kissing people without consent, too. The Doctor, mostly. Which he tends to receive either positively or with a 'comically' dumbfounded look, too. Women like Amy, Clara and Missy (even with villains in queer-coded dynamics it isn't a funny trope), written that way by men who don't understand either feminism or consent. At least during those scenes. 
 
Honestly I'm so tired of seeing the non-con kiss move as a grrrrl power trope :S



Hell, people seem to love the 'Doctor gets kissed' trope so much even Donna Noble, the ultimate best pal who doesn't want anything romantic going on, ends up kissing Ten in this way for comedic effects. After all, the best antidote for cyanide is an abrupt snog, am I right?

4) Then we have Matt Smith's 11th Doctor, who regrettably spends S7 not only being creepy af with Clara, but also kissing his male companion and his lesbian friend for laughs (some of these kisses were also unscripted 😬). What made you into such a creep all of a sudden, Eleven 😐?
 

 
It doesn't matter that Rory makes a disgusted face or that Jenny Flint rightfully slaps him. It's supposed to be funny! Rory is part of a (kinda 'no homo' homophobic) joke about the Doctor's quirks (with another straight character being abruptly kissed for laughs by the always-oh-so-predatory queers - which does check out for Barrowman tho :S 😐). And not only doesn't Eleven ever apologize to Jenny for his creepiness, but the next scene gets her blatantly sexualized by the camera in the following fight, including disturbing screwdriver innuendo courtesy of Eleven (just, wtf). About your lesbian friend. Again. So yeah, joy 😑 
 
 
There's also the fact that it really looks like there are more instances of rape culture and sexual harassment being normalized and played for laughs in New!Who than in more than one era of Classic Who, contemporary in the 1960s of the infamous sexism - both on and offscreen - of Star Trek's TOS o_O

Classic!Who has its share of sexism as well, tho  (we could go on about this whole topic too), including themes of sexual harassment and sexualization. Female cast members were sexualized and probably also harassed on set. And more than one actor was/is dodgy too in these respects, including but not limited to: Patrick Troughton (as much as I love the Second Doctor) and his double lives; Frazer Hines (Jamie McCrimmon) and his cheating and casual pervy comments on female cast members; Richard Franklin (Mike Yates), another rapist and abuser; or Tom Baker (Fourth Doctor) and his pretty blatant sexism when he talks about women in his  interviews. But the thing also is, at least to the point I'm in, the mid-Fourth Doctor era, I've also seen much fewer onscreen instances of rape culture with the First-Fourth Doctor eras than in the freaking whole of New!Who. Which is also kinda troubling.

Fortunately, the series has gotten way better in this respect especially since S9, but we still have moments, like the Jack and Graham kiss from S12, that follow this problematic pattern of making light of sexual assault and harassment. And my perception is that these instances, even if rarer, are still being too celebrated by a part of the community as something harmless, and as legit representation or empowerment :S We deserve female and queer representation, but also need to not normalize rape culture as well.

This is not to say that Doctor Who is as of today unwatchable, not at all. I adore Doctor Who at the same time that I'm also critical of it when it needs to be. And there's definitely also good representation in this respect - Positive female and queer characters, and consensual kisses. Some examples of the latter are Bill Potts and Heather, the second fully consensual takes of Twelve and Missy and Eight and Grace, and the gay couple from S12's 'Praxeus':

 

 
In conclusion, in my opinion it's about being critical of the fandoms we consume as well as enjoying them, especially when there's a problematic trend like this one that can pervade real life in the fandom :S It's important to talk about this too, while also enjoying all the good parts, of course 😀 !