"Whalebone plaques probably had a symbolic function too. Their link with women is clear, being used by women in life and buried with them in death. Perhaps plaques like this one symbolized the central role Viking women played in the home – organizing the household, caring for the family, preparing food and making clothing." (
Source)
Yes, Viking/Scandinavian women may have had
a bit more freedom and legal rights compared to other contemporary European societies (such as the Anglosaxon one, it seems) -
They could have their own money and property (which included
inheriting and
trading),
commission rune stones and be patrons of art, have rich burials (if they were of upper class, of course),
get a divorce,
demand punishment if they were
harassed or raped (although men weren't exactly taught 'not to rape', of course :S), and
some women knew how to fight and it's probable that they would have joined the men in at least some battles, raids, and trading and exploration parties (Material such as
archaeology finds, sagas and annals s
eem to confirm this, disregardless of
archaeology gender bias, but seeing as we're talking about a strictly male-dominated society, these activities probably weren't the norm around women, although
women warriors/Shielmaidens (and
quite a handful, according to burial evidence),
female settlers (
female armed settlers and raiders ignored because of gender bias), and
female explorers, traders and leaders definitely existed). Additionally, women also seem to have been able to
gain some power by taking religious roles (priestesses and völvas (seeresses)).
|
Shieldmaiden Lagertha, by Morris Meredith Williams |
In spite of this, we should bear in mind that
these cases were not the norm either - Vikings (and Scandinavians in general) were still a male-dominated society with strict gender roles, same as mostly every culture, unfortunately, and
the women were the ones expected to take care of the household/farm/estate (disregadless of whether the husband was away or not),
the children and their husband's needs. Some argue that
this role of taking care of the estate and household involved more power than in other societies, but we should still bear in mind that all those (hard) tasks were the responsibility of the women, quite convenient for the menfolk and a double standard which is quite recurrent in most cultures.
|
Viking women by Angus McBride |
Women, exceptions aside, also
couldn't hold significant positions of power or take part in political activities (unless it be as the
consort, Siggy's role in
Vikings, or as a very notable
exception, such as Lagertha becoming Earl in the same series, which still involved taking a man's name and having her position taken from her shortly after). They seemed to be
pretty much discriminated upon by the law in many ways as well, apparently being viewed as under the authority of their fathers and husbands (other cultures have it worse in this respect, such as the Greeks, but that's not a reason to ignore it),
having limited freedom to do what they liked with their own property (even though they had their own property and could inherit),
often not being able to have a say in their families' decision of who they should marry (even though if they were mistreated or insulted,
they could get divorced and got granted
custody of the children),
not being able to be a witness or speak in assemblies (the series
Vikings shows women acting as witnesses and speaking during the
Thing, though, not sure how accurate that is), and also
being punished for 'dressing like men' or carrying weapons, according to some lawbooks (this
could indicate that the shieldmaidens were more of a remarkable minority among women, unless those kind of laws varied depending on the time and lawbook, as happened among the Celts, where the women were able to carry weapons until it was prohibited by law in Medieval Christian Ireland.
I do find that this statement could also clash a bit with all the burial evidence of female warriors, which seem to have been a bit more numerous than 'just the random exception', though).
So there's no need to needlessly romanticize these cultures by calling them 'egalitarian cultures' in the sense we'd do and demand today - and I'm also talking about other cultures such as the Celts, Minoans and Egyptians here as well, because they may have been cultures that offered women some more rights and freedom - and compared to other contemporary or non-contemporary cultures these rights could be seen as quite remarkable (women being able to inherit property among the Celts, but not in Regency times centuries later, for example) -, but they were still generally male-dominated cultures and societies with no true gender equality - Hell, we haven't got true gender equality today! Women were better off in some of those cultures than in other, more patriarchal ones, but gender roles and male-dominated laws and rights still existed, and that is something that is sometimes ignored when it comes to praising a culture for their 'remarkable equality'. Yes, (some) women being able to have property, choose a husband or take arms to defend themselves are unfortunately 'radical notions' and remarkable aspects that should be taken into account and appreciated (because women in other societies and cultures don't get to enjoy those 'remarkable rights'), but they're, after all, 'remarkable' simply because the basis of all these societies is male-dominated, so basic human rights are considered 'worthy of praise' and 'a sign of a truly egalitarian society' if they're offered to (some) women, it would seem :S.
And let's finish this post with some shieldmaiden appreciation while closet-cosplaying (or should I say shop-cosplaying?) a pair of Viking warrior-women in the British Museum shop :D
Beautiful pieces. This post and the previous one make me want to return to the British Museum quite badly…
ReplyDeleteAnd very, very interesting discussion on the role of women in the Viking society! Thanks a lot for writing it, I like learning about these things and I feel like I should do more reading :)
Oh, and I absolutely love the last two pictures, of course xD
Glad you liked the posts :)!
DeleteWe ended up not getting those toy weapons, but I think we're not completely happy with that decision, and there's another London trip awaiting us, so we'll see xD
I completely agree with what you say, Sword-woman Ríona Bandraoi!! :) :)
ReplyDelete:) *hug* :)
Delete<3 <3
Delete