I found
this list about "20 things women do that men probably don't know about" the other day (thanks, Facebook, for giving me
such profound things to read). You can find it here. Not the best read (I will
copy the points of the list below when I
comment it, too).
Although I
usually just scroll down these kind of lists (after scoffing inwardly for a bit
about sexist stereotypes), I'm feeling
activist and snarky, so let's critisize stereotypes for a bit.
Before I begin, I suppose that some people will not be interested in a more or less lengthy, and 100% snarky,
commentary about a theoretically "harmless" list ridden with gender stereotypes. I really don't force anyone to read anything. So
please, let us not have any comments about how I overreact to a harmless 'fun'
list on the Internet, and how I must have a lot of free time, or how I'm a
'crazed, bitter feminist'. I do enjoy myself by writing snarky responses to
stereotyped texts, because yes, I am against stereotypes and don't think
they're fun or healthy. And no, I'm not exactly bitter because of it, although
my life would be so much better without unnecessary gender roles. To each their
own :)! Only, I don't feed trolls.
Before
commenting on each point, I'd just like to mention that I'm not a fan of
generalisations. Generalisations are often wrong, misleading and/or prejudiced
or ridden with stereotypes. Generalisations do people very little good and
they're certainly not the best argument to use if you want to validate a
point. I'm saying this because this list
- as well as so many others - is brimming with generalisations about how women
supposedly act and think, thus promoting a lot of stereotypes that are not true
in many cases (some of these, or all, may be true for a faction of women, but
certainly not for all), and not exactly harmless, either. And the same goes for lists about how men
supposedly think and act.
I think
these lists bug me quite a lot because they appear shallow and harmless, but
they keep promoting these unhealthy stereotypes that just enforce sexism. Just notice how this list about 'things
women do that men don't know about' MAINLY focuses on physical aspects having
to do with clothes, make-up, evaluation of the body and so on. There is
practically nothing about character or mind or thought, or anything else (after all..."what else is there?!").
According to this list, women are beings who overly focus on their bodies and
are usually self-conscious about them, feeling pressured to conform to a
certain 'ideal body'. It is inferred that all use make-up and shave their body
hair. It is inferred that all have deep interest about clothes. The only
non-physical point of this list is that theoretically women get emotional in an
irrational way from time to time. And for them, apparently, breasts are apparently so important when it comes to defining their "womanhood".
While
many women may identify with some or even all of these points, what bugs me is
that the writer chose these frankly shallow points as points that theoretically
describe what a woman is versus a man. Men are also pressured to conform to
certain body types and ideals in our society, but to a lesser extent than
women, of course, and if one takes a look at these kind of lists, for men, there
are comparatively very few points about physicality and 'beauty themes', and
way more points about character, thought and action. And specifically quite a
few points about how women make myths about men, and how they aren't really
true. And
yet women's lists, not all of them but way too many, still focus on these beauty
points and apparently they're not myths or generalisations or anything. See, just at the right of this '20 things women do
that men probably don't know about' is another list called '20 myths about men
that need to be erradicated immediately'. Double standards much?
Some of these points I have done or
experienced. But I would never say that such things as poking myself in the eye
with a mascara wand or wearing the same bra for a few days defines me as a woman (I'm also non-binary and gender critical, so the concept of 'defining myself as a woman' doesn't even apply to me). Given that 99% of
these points are about someone's beauty
routine and thoughts on their body, generalized to extend to all women, I would
hardly say they're a good way to describe a whole sex, or a whole gender (even if the gender construct does come with a lot of these subjective stereotypes).
And about the title, 'that men probably don't know about'...No wonder men don't know about aspects having to do with someone's private routine! Some of these stereotyped thoughts are so stereotyped, though, I do think men already must know about them. After all, we don't stop reading about how all women should be self-conscious about their bodies because they don't conform to the idealised body of society, or how women are so irrational and governed by PMS, right?
And about the title, 'that men probably don't know about'...No wonder men don't know about aspects having to do with someone's private routine! Some of these stereotyped thoughts are so stereotyped, though, I do think men already must know about them. After all, we don't stop reading about how all women should be self-conscious about their bodies because they don't conform to the idealised body of society, or how women are so irrational and governed by PMS, right?
If someone wanted to 'define herself/themselves as a woman', first
of all (and I repeat that for some people who are trans, agender, non-binary, genderfluid, and/or queer in some other way, that concept nay either not 't even apply, or apply in a very different way), I guess they'd prefer to define herself/themself without using too many gender-biased
stereotypes, which basically make no sense. And second, while they could talk about their body at a certain point (this post is focused on women with female bodies only, though), they would probably choose aspects that had to so with character and way
of thinking before and/or at least in addition to their body and, indeed, before their personal beauty routine. Also, you cannot expect to summarize a complex
individual, disregardless of their sex (and/or gender), by 20 points about someone's personal
ideas, like I said. According to this list, I'm just someone who's seemingly
rather obsessed with her breasts, self-conscious
about her body, jealous of the bodies of other women, equaling her beauty
routine to everyone's beauty routine and the very "essence of womanhood", and crying irrationally to add a bit
of variety. Yeah, I think I'll write another list for myself, if you don't mind.
Pretty much |
So, a bit of a more detailed commentary on each
point. Read on if you're interested!
-UPDATE: A commenter just kindly let me know that these points were selected in a pretty biased way and taken out of context from this Reddit, where individual women are commenting about things that they do or have done. Meanwhile, the Tickl post takes the problematic turn of selecting (in a biased and subjective way) a few of these personal, individual experiences, taking them out of context and massively generalizing them so that they're the things that apparently define women vs men. Thus, we go from a series of relatively harmless, individual experiences (still influenced by gender roles, but that's another issue) to a stereotype-promoting message implying that women are these beauty-obsessed and emotionally unstable beings who owe society (and men) their appearance. Proof of the harm which something can do when taken out of context and interpretated in a subjective, biased and manipulative way. And that is NOT OKAY. I don't care if the selecter's original intention wasn't to promote an stereotyped view of women. That's what (s)he is doing.
-UPDATE: A commenter just kindly let me know that these points were selected in a pretty biased way and taken out of context from this Reddit, where individual women are commenting about things that they do or have done. Meanwhile, the Tickl post takes the problematic turn of selecting (in a biased and subjective way) a few of these personal, individual experiences, taking them out of context and massively generalizing them so that they're the things that apparently define women vs men. Thus, we go from a series of relatively harmless, individual experiences (still influenced by gender roles, but that's another issue) to a stereotype-promoting message implying that women are these beauty-obsessed and emotionally unstable beings who owe society (and men) their appearance. Proof of the harm which something can do when taken out of context and interpretated in a subjective, biased and manipulative way. And that is NOT OKAY. I don't care if the selecter's original intention wasn't to promote an stereotyped view of women. That's what (s)he is doing.