I would like to begin to redress the fact that I don't often blog about science here with a post about my thesis defense 😃🌟🪐🔭📚📐📃📊. A thesis on Stellar Astrophysics that I finally defended the last 10th of May after years of working on my PhD project, so I can now call myself a Doctor in Astrophysics 😄 (as a Whovian, this translates to 🎵Doo-wee-ooo!🎵 xDD).
Result! |
Come on, you knew I had to make that pun xD |
✨Read and download my PhD thesis here as a Google Drive file, on ADS, and on the UCM E-prints.
✨Browse and download all the data tables here as Google Drive files, in .FITS and Excel .xlsx formats.
This meme seems fitting, considering my childhood self kept drawing huge stars, vaguely spherical planets and especially purple Saturn's 😁🤣👌🌟🪐📝 |
🌟Format and abstract:
I organized my thesis as follows: After the initial quotes (including Doctor Who and Tolkien, of course xD) and the acknowledgments, this book begins with an abstract in both Spanish and English summarizing the context, aims, methods and results of my PhD project. The thesis has 5 chapters, 6 appendixes, and finally, a bibliography with all the references that I used in this work.
As well as briefly describing the content of the chapters and appendixes, I'm also adding a slightly more summarized version of the first paragraphs from the abstract, so as to better contextualize and explain a bit of what my thesis is about in this post:
A stellar spectrum measured by GES, indicating a significant Li I line at 6707.76 Å, as well as the adjacent Fe I line at 6707.43 Å. |
Lithium is a very fragile element that is easily destroyed in stellar interiors. In solar-type and lower mass stars, lithium is slowly being depleted and its surface abundance decreases over time. For this reason, lithium is a very sensitive tracer of stellar evolution, and is especially relevant in the determination of the age of stellar clusters.
The lithium abundance observed in pre- and main-sequence late-type stars is strongly age-dependent, but also shows a complex pattern depending on several parameters, such as rotation, chromospheric activity, metallicity, mixing mechanisms, and convection structure. The best way to calibrate these effects is to analyse coeval groups of stars, such as open clusters and associations.
For all the analysis in this thesis we have used the latest data release provided by the Gaia-ESO Survey (GES), GES iDR6, as well as the data provided by Gaia EDR3. GES is a large, public spectroscopic survey that provides an homogeneous overview of the distribution of kinematics, dynamical structure and chemical compositions in the Galaxy, and has measured data for a great number of stars, as well as near 100 open clusters, from 2011 until 2018. This survey uses the multi-object spectrograph FLAMES on the Very Large Telescope (ESO, Chile) to obtain both high resolution spectra with UVES (Ultraviolet and Visual Echelle Spectrograph) and medium resolution spectra with GIRAFFE.
An artist’s concept of the Gaia spacecraft. Credit: ESA |
Chapter 1 introduces an overview of all the topics and scientific background that a reader could need to better understand and contextualize this work: From stellar nucleosynthesis to lithium depletion, the Li-age relation, the dependence of Li on parameters such as rotation, activity and metallicity, and an overview of GES, Gaia and other missions and surveys from which we used data in our analysis.
Chapter 2 begins by describing the star cluster sample that we used throughout the whole project and then details the throrough membership analysis that we conducted to obtain lists of robust candidate members for each cluster. To obtain these lists of clusters members, we made use of all available parameters derived from the GES spectroscopic observations, and we explored numerous criteria: Kinematics, analysis of the astrometry and photometry provided by Gaia, gravity indicators, metallicity, and Li content. All these membership analyses were complemented with detailed bibliographical searches and contrasted with existing membership studies using data from Gaia.
In Chapter 3 we then conducted a comparative study that allowed us to quantify the observable lithium dispersion in each cluster, and analyse in detail its dependence with several other stellar parameters derived from GES: rotation, accretion indicators, chromospheric activity (Hα), and metallicity. We were in this way able to confirm the correlations and findings of earlier publications regarding the dependence of Li with rotation and activity, and we additionally observed the effects of metallicity in the Li depletion of coeval clusters. In this chapter we also included a general overview of the evolution of rotation (gyrochronology) and activity across age and their dependence with colour and stellar mass, making use of rotation-colour and activity-colour diagrams.
The empirical Li envelopes obtained in this project, plotted in a EW(Li) vs Teff diagram |
The identification of likely candidate members of all clusters and the characterizations of the properties of these candidates finally allowed us to calibrate a Li-age relation in Chapter 4. We did this by obtaining a series of empirical lithium envelopes for key ages in our cluster sample. We also constrained the lithium depletion boundary (LDB) for those clusters in the 15-500 Myr age range with the aid of several models. One of the applications of these lithium envelopes when it comes to using lithium as an effective age indicator is to plot field stars whose age is yet unknown in EW(Li) vs Teff diagrams, and use the Li envelopes as a guide to estimate their ages.
In the last chapter, Chapter 5, we summarized our results and described our future work. Our main objective regarding future work is to use this Li-age relation and the empirical envelopes we have obtained to infer age ranges for GES field stars whose ages are still unknown, as well as identify their potential membership to stellar kinematic groups of different ages.
As for the appendixes, Appendix A includes the list of publications (which I'll also add below), Appendix B contains individual notes for each sample cluster, detailing the membership analysis, relevant particular cases, a thorough comparison with other membership studies from the literature, and also individual cases regarding the study of rotation and activity. Then we have Appendixes C and E, with all the individual graphs and diagrams pertaining to the membership analysis for each cluster (Appendix C), as well as the dependence of the Li content on rotation and activity (Appendix E). Appendix D, for its part, describes the format and content of all the long data tables (available online, link also above in this post) including all GES and Gaia parameters used in this work, as well as detailed information on membership analysis, the lists of final candidate members, and particular cases of interest (Li-rich giant contaminants, strong accretors and binaries). Finally, Appendix F lists in table format the obtained empirical envelopes from Chapter 4.
🌟List of publications:
The PDF below shows the list of publications during my PhD years. The most important one is a first author scientific paper, published in 2020 in the refereed journal Astronomy&Astrophysics (A&A). This paper describes the membership analysis of 20 out of the 42 open clusters in my thesis, using the data from the fourth data release from GES, iDR4 - This cluster calibration work was later updated and expanded 22 more clusters, and using the data from GES iDR6 and Gaia EDR3, as described above.
As part of the GES consortium, I also became a coauthor of five more articles published in refereed journals (four in A&A and one in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society). The PDF also lists and links to a series of posters and abstracts published as conference proceedings and/or presented at several conferences from 2015 to 2021.
✨You can also find my list of publications on ORCID and Scopus.
🌟My thesis project is also summarized in my PhD defense presentation, which you can also see here below:
And finally, here are some pics from the thesis defense, taken by Dark Sapiens, Pilar Erika, and my supervisor David Montes:
So that's it for today's science post 😀🌟 🌌🔭! I'd like to post a bit more often about Astrophysics and science on here, and I was thinking about maybe starting by doing another post about the article that I got published in A&A back in 2020. This article is the first part of the one that I'm writing right now, including all the final analysis and results of my PhD project, so we'll see when they appear on here!
In the meantime -
Doctor out 😁✨💙🌈! |
Congratulations, Doctor!!!! 😃😃😃😃
ReplyDelete😃✨📃🌟🪐 💙
DeleteBuen trabajo, Doctora 💙💻📚📐🌟
ReplyDelete😃🌟🪐📃 💙
Delete